SRS (Simple Realtime Server) is a high-efficiency open-source media server for live video. It ingests and delivers streams over RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP-FLV, HTTP-TS, SRT, MPEG-DASH and GB28181, with codec support for H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9, AAC, Opus and G.711. The server is highly configurable, clusters well for large audiences, and integrates with existing workflows through its broad protocol support.
Tvheadend is a popular, open-source TV streaming server for Linux. It supports various input sources, including ATSC, DVB-C/C2, DVB-S/S2, DVB-T/T2, IPTV, SAT>IP, and unix pipe. This software allows users to stream live TV and record shows for later viewing.
- Free and open‑source
- Supports a wide range of streaming protocols
- Low latency suitable for interactive use cases
- Active community support via GitHub and forums
- Free and open-source
- Supports multiple input sources
- Includes a web-based interface
- Allows users to schedule recordings and manage TV listings
- Requires manual self‑hosting and configuration
- Documentation can be fragmented for beginners
- Limited official commercial support options
- Limited user support
- Requires technical knowledge to set up
- Not suitable for large-scale commercial use
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to SRS
View all →
Alternatives to tvheadend
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataSRS is a high‑efficiency, open‑source real‑time video server for developers needing low‑latency streaming across many protocols, while tvheadend is a Linux‑based TV streaming/DVR server aimed at home users and small businesses.
Key differences
- •Protocol support: SRS handles RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, MPEG‑DASH, SRT, GB28181; tvheadend focuses on broadcast standards (ATSC, DVB, IPTV).
- •Primary use case: SRS is built for real‑time interactive streaming; tvheadend is built for live TV reception and recording.
- •Management interface: tvheadend provides a ready web UI for scheduling recordings; SRS offers only HTTP API/Callbacks, no built‑in UI.
- •Scalability focus: SRS includes load‑balancing and clustering for thousands of concurrent streams; tvheadend has no such features.
- •Target audience: SRS targets developers/media professionals; tvheadend targets home users/small businesses.
Pricing & value
Both are free, but SRS offers broader protocol support and clustering, delivering more value for complex streaming needs.
Ease of use / learning curve
tvheadend includes a web‑based UI and simpler TV‑tuner setup; SRS requires manual self‑hosting and fragmented docs.
Features & depth
SRS supports many modern streaming protocols, low‑latency WebRTC, and load‑balancing; tvheadend is limited to broadcast/recording features.
Integrations & ecosystem
SRS provides HTTP API, callbacks, Prometheus exporter, and GitHub community; tvheadend offers an API but fewer integration points.
Scalability
SRS explicitly includes load‑balancing and clustering for thousands of concurrent users; tvheadend lacks such capabilities.
Support
tvheadend lists email support plus community forum; SRS relies solely on GitHub issues and community forum.
Security & privacy
Both are open‑source with no specified commercial security guarantees; no specific security features are detailed.
Choose SRS if…
Developers or media teams building low‑latency, multi‑protocol streaming services at scale.
Choose tvheadend if…
Home enthusiasts or small businesses needing TV tuner reception, DVR scheduling, and a simple web UI.
Common questions
Can either product be used for large‑scale commercial streaming?
SRS is designed with clustering and load‑balancing for thousands of concurrent streams; tvheadend is not suited for large‑scale commercial use.
Do both solutions provide a graphical management interface?
tvheadend includes a web‑based UI; SRS only offers an HTTP API and callbacks, no built‑in GUI.
Which product supports modern low‑latency protocols like WebRTC?
SRS supports native WebRTC publishing and playback; tvheadend does not list WebRTC support.