Tasks.md
Minimal self‑hosted task board using plain Markdown files
Alternatives
Choose Personal Management System if…
- you need a cloud app with no installation
- you want tasks shown alongside a synced calendar
- you need built‑in goal‑milestone tracking
- you rely on email reminders for deadlines
- you prefer drag‑and‑drop ordering of tasks
Choose obsidian-tasks if…
- you need tasks to live in the same markdown vault as your
- you want powerful query‑based filtering without a separate
- you prefer a zero‑maintenance, desktop‑only setup
- you rely on recurring tasks and date‑based filters within
Choose namviek if…
- you need real‑time board updates for all users
- you require role‑based permissions to limit task access
- you want a REST API to hook the task manager into other
- you prefer a modern stack (Express/MongoDB/Next.js) for
- you need unlimited Kanban boards without file‑system limits
Choose planka if…
- you need instant board updates for multiple users
- you already use OpenID Connect for SSO
- you want notifications to Slack, Teams, or email
- you prefer a Docker‑only deployment with built‑in
How to Decide
Tasks.md is a minimal self‑hosted task board that stores each card as a plain Markdown file and is used by individuals and small teams who want full data control. The alternatives split into a few clear camps: planka leans into real‑time synchronization for collaborative Kanban boards; obsidian‑tasks is chosen for its deep integration as an Obsidian plugin that lives inside your note‑taking workflow; Personal Management System is distinguished by its fully web‑based SaaS experience with built‑in calendar views and Zapier‑style automation; namviek stands out with an extensible RESTful API that lets you build custom integrations and tailor workflow rules.
When comparing these options, focus on (1) where the data lives – self‑hosted Docker containers versus cloud SaaS – because it determines control, backup and offline capability; (2) the level of real‑time collaboration – instant sync versus single‑user or manual refresh – which impacts team coordination; (3) integration and extensibility – native markdown support, Obsidian plugin hooks, Zapier/API connections or REST endpoints – that dictate how well the tool fits into existing toolchains; (4) deployment platform – browser‑only web app, desktop‑only plugin, or self‑hosted container – which influences setup complexity and device accessibility; and (5) feature focus such as built‑in calendar views or advanced reporting, which varies across the alternatives and can be a deciding factor for workflow needs.
All Alternatives
About the Product
Is this your tool?
Claim this page to update details, reply to user reviews, and drive more traffic to your product.
Claim this Product →