Call of Duty: World at War vs Medal of Honor
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Set during the final years of World War II, Call of Duty: World at War delivers a brutal, cinematic experience across the Pacific and Eastern Front. Players command squads in iconic battles, from the beaches of Iwo Jima to the streets of Stalingrad, with visceral gunplay and realistic environments. The game also introduced robust multiplayer modes, including co‑operative campaigns and split‑screen deathmatches, establishing a foundation for future titles in the franchise.
Set during World War II, Medal of Honor puts players in the boots of an elite operative behind enemy lines, delivering a cinematic campaign filled with intense firefights and covert missions. The game balances fast‑paced shooting with stealth tactics, offering both solo and cooperative experiences across multiple platforms.
- Engaging historical storyline
- Robust co‑op and split‑screen options
- Varied multiplayer modes
- Strong weapon authenticity
- Engaging WWII storyline
- Strong blend of stealth and action
- Varied multiplayer modes
- Authentic weapon recreation
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Limited map variety compared to later titles
- Occasional AI pathing issues
- Occasional AI glitches
- Multiplayer matchmaking can be slow
- Limited map variety
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Call of Duty: World at War
View all →
A groundbreaking first‑person shooter that redefined modern combat gaming
Alternatives to Medal of Honor
View all →
Experience the intensity of WWII combat in a classic first‑person shooter
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataCall of Duty: World at War is the safer default choice due to its higher critic score and local split-screen support, while Medal of Honor trades those away for a stealth-focused campaign and branching narrative.
Key differences
- •Call of Duty: World at War features local split-screen support for up to four players and the hidden 'Nazi Zombies' mode, neither of which are mentioned for Medal of Honor.
- •Medal of Honor offers a stealth-focused campaign with branching narratives and multiple mission outcomes, whereas Call of Duty relies on scripted historical set-pieces and AI squadmate orders.
- •Call of Duty: World at War achieved a higher critic score of 80/100 compared to Medal of Honor's 74/100.
- •Medal of Honor supports online multiplayer for up to 16 players with a robust progression system, while Call of Duty includes deathmatch, capture-the-flag, and cross-generation support on PS3 and Xbox 360.
Gameplay & fun factor
Call of Duty features scripted historical set-pieces and tactical AI squadmates, while Medal of Honor blends action with stealth takedowns.
Platform availability
Call of Duty explicitly features cross-generation support for PS3 and Xbox 360; platform details for Medal of Honor are not specified.
Price & value
Both games share an identical one-time paid MSRP of $59.99.
Multiplayer / co-op
Call of Duty includes 4-player local split-screen and the hidden 'Nazi Zombies' co-op mode alongside online multiplayer.
Content & replayability
Medal of Honor features a branching campaign with multiple mission outcomes and a robust progression system to unlock gear.
Difficulty & accessibility
Call of Duty includes AI-controlled squadmates that follow orders to provide tactical support, unlike Medal of Honor.
Graphics & performance
Call of Duty has a higher critic score of 80/100, though both share cons regarding dated graphics or AI issues.
Choose Call of Duty: World at War if…
Shooter fans wanting local split-screen, co-op campaigns, and the famous Nazi Zombies mode.
Choose Medal of Honor if…
Players looking for a WWII shooter focused on stealth takedowns and branching campaign narratives.
Common questions
Do both games cost the same?
Yes, both Call of Duty: World at War and Medal of Honor have a one-time MSRP of $59.99.
Does Medal of Honor have split-screen multiplayer?
Split-screen is not specified for Medal of Honor, whereas Call of Duty: World at War supports local split-screen for up to four players.
Which game has a better critical reception?
Call of Duty: World at War has a critic score of 80/100, while Medal of Honor holds a critic score of 74/100.