Call of Duty: World at War vs Medal of Honor: Heroes
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Set during the final years of World War II, Call of Duty: World at War delivers a brutal, cinematic experience across the Pacific and Eastern Front. Players command squads in iconic battles, from the beaches of Iwo Jima to the streets of Stalingrad, with visceral gunplay and realistic environments. The game also introduced robust multiplayer modes, including co‑operative campaigns and split‑screen deathmatches, establishing a foundation for future titles in the franchise.
Medal of Honor: Heroes delivers intense first‑person shooter action set during World War II, letting players experience iconic battles across Europe. The game blends arcade‑style gunplay with strategic objectives, offering both single‑player missions and multiplayer modes. Developed by EA Canada and published by Electronic Arts, the title features a variety of weapons, destructible environments, and a competitive online component. Though released in 2006, it remains a nostalgic entry for fans of classic military shooters.
- Engaging historical storyline
- Robust co‑op and split‑screen options
- Varied multiplayer modes
- Strong weapon authenticity
- Fast‑paced, accessible combat.
- Variety of weapons and maps.
- Solid multiplayer experience.
- Nostalgic WWII setting.
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Limited map variety compared to later titles
- Occasional AI pathing issues
- Limited graphics by modern standards.
- Short single‑player campaign length.
- Online community has dwindled.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Call of Duty: World at War
View all →
A groundbreaking first‑person shooter that redefined modern combat gaming
Alternatives to Medal of Honor: Heroes
View all →
Experience the intensity of WWII combat in a classic first‑person shooter
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataCall of Duty: World at War offers richer content, co‑op and split‑screen options, and higher critical acclaim, while Medal of Honor: Heroes is cheaper but more limited.
Key differences
- •World at War includes full campaign co‑op and split‑screen for up to four players; Heroes only supports online multiplayer.
- •World at War’s critic score is 80/100 versus Heroes’ 50/100, indicating stronger overall reception.
- •Price gap: $59.99 for World at War versus $19.99 for Heroes, a three‑fold difference.
- •World at War runs on PS3/Xbox 360 (cross‑generation); Heroes is a handheld title (platform not specified beyond that).
- •World at War adds a hidden Nazi Zombies mode and AI squad support, features absent in Heroes.
Gameplay & fun factor
World at War offers campaign co‑op, split‑screen, Zombies mode, and varied multiplayer modes, giving more diverse fun.
Platform availability
Heroes is designed for handheld devices, making it portable; World at War is limited to PS3/Xbox 360.
Price & value
Heroes costs $19.99 versus $59.99 for World at War, delivering lower upfront cost.
Multiplayer / co‑op
World at War supports up to 4‑player split‑screen and full campaign co‑op; Heroes only supports up to 16 online players.
Content & replayability
World at War includes campaign, co‑op, split‑screen, Zombies, and multiple multiplayer modes; Heroes has a 10‑mission campaign and limited maps.
Difficulty & accessibility
Heroes is rated ESRB T, likely easier for younger players; World at War is PEGI 18/ESRB M, more mature.
Graphics & performance
Both are dated by modern standards; no specific performance data to differentiate.
Choose Call of Duty: World at War if…
Players who want deep WWII experience, co‑op/split‑screen, and higher quality content.
Choose Medal of Honor: Heroes if…
Budget‑focused gamers seeking quick handheld WWII matches.
Common questions
Is World at War worth the higher price?
At $59.99 it offers more modes, co‑op, split‑screen, and a higher critic score (80) than Heroes.
Can I play either game on a modern console?
World at War supports PS3/Xbox 360 (cross‑generation); platform for Heroes is unspecified beyond handheld.
Which game has better multiplayer options?
World at War provides split‑screen, co‑op, and multiple mode types; Heroes only offers online deathmatch/team modes.