Call of Duty: World at War vs Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Set during the final years of World War II, Call of Duty: World at War delivers a brutal, cinematic experience across the Pacific and Eastern Front. Players command squads in iconic battles, from the beaches of Iwo Jima to the streets of Stalingrad, with visceral gunplay and realistic environments. The game also introduced robust multiplayer modes, including co‑operative campaigns and split‑screen deathmatches, establishing a foundation for future titles in the franchise.
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault puts players in the boots of an elite soldier during the pivotal moments of World War II. From the D‑Day beaches to the streets of occupied France, the game delivers cinematic missions and gritty realism. The title features both a gripping single‑player campaign and robust multiplayer modes, allowing you to battle friends or AI across historic battlefields. Its legacy as a benchmark WWII shooter still resonates with fans of action‑packed, historically grounded warfare games.
- Engaging historical storyline
- Robust co‑op and split‑screen options
- Varied multiplayer modes
- Strong weapon authenticity
- Authentic WWII settings
- Strong single‑player narrative
- Solid multiplayer support
- Mod‑friendly engine
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Limited map variety compared to later titles
- Occasional AI pathing issues
- Aged graphics by modern standards
- Limited AI sophistication
- Occasional multiplayer lag
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Call of Duty: World at War
View all →
A groundbreaking first‑person shooter that redefined modern combat gaming
Alternatives to Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
View all →
Experience gritty, realistic WWII combat in a massive open‑world sandbox
Tactical WWII shooter blending stealth and action for intense squad missions
Experience massive World War II battles in a groundbreaking multiplayer shooter
Conquer the Italian front in classic WWII multiplayer action
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth games offer critically acclaimed WWII shooter action priced as a one-time purchase with matching 80/100 critic scores, but Call of Duty: World at War is the safer default for modern console players seeking co-op modes, whereas Medal of Honor: Allied Assault caters to PC and Linux players prioritizing larger online matches and modding.
Key differences
- •Co-op and Split-Screen: Call of Duty: World at War features 2-player campaign co-op, split-screen for up to 4 players, and the 'Nazi Zombies' mode, while Medal of Honor: Allied Assault only lists standard single-player and multiplayer without local co-op features.
- •Multiplayer Scale and Platform Support: Medal of Honor supports up to 32 players online with cross-platform play for Linux, Windows, and macOS, whereas Call of Duty offers deathmatch, capture-the-flag, and cross-generation support for PS3 and Xbox 360.
- •Age Ratings and Content Suitability: Call of Duty carries an ESRB M and PEGI 18 rating, while Medal of Honor is rated ESRB T and PEGI 12.
- •Release Era and Developer: Call of Duty: World at War was released in November 2008 by Treyarch, whereas Medal of Honor: Allied Assault launched in January 2002 by developer 2015 and published by Electronic Arts and Aspyr Media.
Gameplay & fun factor
Both games score 80/100 from critics and feature historically based WWII missions with authentic weaponry, action, and set-pieces.
Platform availability
Call of Duty supports PS3 and Xbox 360 with cross-generation play; Medal of Honor supports Linux, Windows, and macOS with cross-platform play.
Price & value
Both titles are sold as a paid, one-time purchase, though an exact MSRP is only specified for Call of Duty at $59.99.
Multiplayer / co-op
Call of Duty includes 2-player campaign co-op, split-screen up to 4 players, and 'Nazi Zombies', outperforming Medal of Honor's basic multiplayer.
Content & replayability
Medal of Honor features a mod-friendly engine for custom maps and a robust ranking/unlock system, plus online matches for up to 32 players.
Difficulty & accessibility
Medal of Honor has a lower ESRB T and PEGI 12 age rating compared to Call of Duty's M and PEGI 18 rating.
Graphics & performance
Both games feature aged graphics by modern standards, with Call of Duty noted for dynamic environmental destruction and Medal of Honor for dynamic lighting.
Choose Call of Duty: World at War if…
Shooter fans wanting local split-screen play, co-op campaigns, and the Nazi Zombies mode on console.
Choose Medal of Honor: Allied Assault if…
PC and Linux players wanting large 32-player online matches and a mod-friendly engine.
Common questions
How much do these games cost?
Both are paid one-time purchases, though Call of Duty: World at War has a specified MSRP of $59.99 while Medal of Honor's exact MSRP is not specified.
Do either of these games support multiplayer or co-op?
Yes, Call of Duty offers single-player, multiplayer, 2-player co-op, and up to 4-player local split-screen. Medal of Honor offers single-player and multiplayer supporting up to 32 players.
What are the age ratings for these games?
Call of Duty: World at War is rated PEGI 18 and ESRB M, while Medal of Honor: Allied Assault is rated PEGI 12 and ESRB T.