FindAlternative
Back to Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800

Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800 vs ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800High‑performance, scale‑out NAS for massive unstructured data workloads
ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000
ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000High‑performance scalable storage for edge and data‑center workloads
Overview
Description

The PowerScale F800 delivers petabyte‑scale storage with a single, unified file system that simplifies management across multiple nodes. Built for demanding environments, it offers high throughput, low latency, and seamless scalability without downtime. Designed for data‑intensive enterprises, the F800 integrates advanced data protection, tiering, and analytics, enabling fast access to files while reducing total cost of ownership. Its modular architecture lets you add capacity and performance as your needs grow.

The ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000 is a modular, flash‑based storage appliance designed for low‑latency, high‑throughput environments. It combines NVMe over Fabrics with intelligent data tiering to deliver consistent performance across cloud, edge, and on‑premises deployments. Built with a rugged chassis and hot‑swappable drive bays, the HyperSF 1000 supports seamless scaling from a single node to multi‑node clusters, making it suitable for AI training, real‑time analytics, and enterprise backup workloads.

Pricing
—
—
Category
NAS Devices
NAS Devices
Best for
Enterprise IT and data‑center teams
Enterprises and edge‑compute operators
Specifications
warranty
3 years+50%
2 years
open source
No
No
connectivity
10/25/40 GbE Ethernet, optional InfiniBand
10 GbE, 25 GbE, NVMe‑over‑Fabric
power source
AC Powered
AC Powered
weight
—
8 kg
dimensions
—
44 x 10 x 5 cm (2‑U)
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Linear scalability without downtime
  • Unified OneFS simplifies management
  • Robust data protection with erasure coding
  • Multi‑protocol support for diverse workloads
  • Sub‑microsecond latency
  • Linear performance scaling
  • Hot‑swappable drives for zero‑downtime
  • Robust data protection features
Cons
  • High upfront capital expense
  • Complex initial configuration
  • Requires specialized IT expertise for optimal tuning
  • High upfront cost
  • Requires specialized networking expertise
  • Limited to rack‑mount form factor
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800

View all →
Huawei OceanStor 9000
Huawei OceanStor 9000

A high-performance scale-out NAS storage system designed for massive unstructured data.

Compare
NetApp FAS2700
NetApp FAS2700

Reliable and intelligent hybrid flash storage for midsize enterprise workloads.

Compare
ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000
ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

High‑performance scalable storage for edge and data‑center workloads

Compare

Alternatives to ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

View all →
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800

High‑performance, scale‑out NAS for massive unstructured data workloads

Compare
NetApp FAS2700
NetApp FAS2700

Reliable and intelligent hybrid flash storage for midsize enterprise workloads.

Compare
Pure Storage FlashArray//X
Pure Storage FlashArray//X

An all-NVMe enterprise flash array engineered for Tier-1 application performance and availability.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Dell EMC PowerScale F800 offers far higher raw throughput and broader protocol support, while ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000 provides ruggedized, edge‑ready design with superior NVMe connectivity.

Key differences

  • •Maximum aggregate throughput: 2.5 TB/s (PowerScale) vs 200 GB/s (HyperSF).
  • •Supported protocols: PowerScale handles NFS, SMB, HDFS, S3; HyperSF focuses on NVMe‑over‑TCP/RDMA and REST API.
  • •Form factor and durability: HyperSF is a ruggedized 2‑U chassis rated for 40 °C and 10 k‑hour MTBF; PowerScale has no such ruggedness claim.
  • •Warranty length: PowerScale 3 years vs HyperSF 2 years.
  • •Hot‑swap capability: HyperSF offers hot‑swappable NVMe drives; PowerScale does not mention hot‑swap.
DimensionWinner

Performance

PowerScale delivers up to 2.5 TB/s aggregate throughput, far exceeding HyperSF's 200 GB/s.

Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800

Build quality

HyperSF specifies a ruggedized enclosure, 40 °C operating limit and 10 k‑hour MTBF; PowerScale provides no such specs.

ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

Connectivity

HyperSF includes NVMe‑over‑Fabric in addition to 10/25 GbE, while PowerScale offers up to 40 GbE and optional InfiniBand only.

ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

Power & efficiency

No power consumption or efficiency data provided for either product.

Tie

Compatibility

PowerScale supports NFS, SMB, HDFS, and S3 simultaneously; HyperSF focuses on NVMe protocols only.

Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800

Pricing & value

Pricing is listed as unknown for both; both note high upfront cost.

Tie

Warranty & support

PowerScale includes a 3‑year warranty, compared with HyperSF's 2‑year warranty.

Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800

Choose Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800 if…

Enterprises needing massive file‑based workloads, multi‑protocol access, and maximum throughput.

Choose ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000 if…

Edge or data‑center sites requiring rugged hardware, hot‑swappable NVMe drives, and ultra‑low latency NVMe access.

Common questions

Which system offers higher raw throughput for large data sets?

PowerScale F800, with up to 2.5 TB/s aggregate throughput versus HyperSF's 200 GB/s.

Do either of these products support hot‑swap drive replacement?

Only HyperSF 1000 mentions hot‑swappable NVMe drives for zero‑downtime maintenance.

What warranty period does each product provide?

PowerScale includes a 3‑year warranty; HyperSF provides a 2‑year warranty.