FindAlternative
Back to NetApp FAS2700

NetApp FAS2700 vs ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
NetApp FAS2700
NetApp FAS2700Reliable and intelligent hybrid flash storage for midsize enterprise workloads.
ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000
ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000High‑performance scalable storage for edge and data‑center workloads
Overview
Description

The NetApp FAS2700 hybrid flash storage system delivers enterprise-grade data management, robust security, and seamless cloud integration for growing businesses. Engineered for efficiency and performance, it helps organizations consolidate workloads while simplifying complex IT operations. Powered by NetApp ONTAP data management software, this storage array provides advanced data reduction, automated tiering, and comprehensive protection features. Its balanced architecture ensures high availability and predictable performance for virtualized environments, databases, and file shares.

The ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000 is a modular, flash‑based storage appliance designed for low‑latency, high‑throughput environments. It combines NVMe over Fabrics with intelligent data tiering to deliver consistent performance across cloud, edge, and on‑premises deployments. Built with a rugged chassis and hot‑swappable drive bays, the HyperSF 1000 supports seamless scaling from a single node to multi‑node clusters, making it suitable for AI training, real‑time analytics, and enterprise backup workloads.

Pricing
—
—
Category
NAS Devices
NAS Devices
Best for
Enterprise IT administrators and midsize businesses
Enterprises and edge‑compute operators
Specifications
weight
24.5 kg+206%
8 kg
warranty
3-year standard hardware warranty+50%
2 years
dimensions
44.7 x 48.3 x 8.6 cm (2U rackmount)+2%
44 x 10 x 5 cm (2‑U)
open source
No
No
connectivity
10GbE, 1GbE, 16Gb/32Gb FC, 12Gb SAS
10 GbE, 25 GbE, NVMe‑over‑Fabric
power source
AC Powered
AC Powered
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Unified SAN and NAS support
  • Advanced data reduction efficiency
  • Strong enterprise data protection
  • Seamless hybrid cloud connectivity
  • Sub‑microsecond latency
  • Linear performance scaling
  • Hot‑swappable drives for zero‑downtime
  • Robust data protection features
Cons
  • Complex initial configuration for beginners
  • High acquisition and maintenance cost
  • Requires specialized administrative skills
  • High upfront cost
  • Requires specialized networking expertise
  • Limited to rack‑mount form factor
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to NetApp FAS2700

View all →
Pure Storage FlashArray//X
Pure Storage FlashArray//X

An all-NVMe enterprise flash array engineered for Tier-1 application performance and availability.

Compare
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro

Four-bay NAS for professionals and businesses

Compare
Huawei OceanStor 9000
Huawei OceanStor 9000

A high-performance scale-out NAS storage system designed for massive unstructured data.

Compare
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800

High‑performance, scale‑out NAS for massive unstructured data workloads

Compare

Alternatives to ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

View all →
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS (Isilon) F800

High‑performance, scale‑out NAS for massive unstructured data workloads

Compare
NetApp FAS2700
NetApp FAS2700

Reliable and intelligent hybrid flash storage for midsize enterprise workloads.

Compare
Pure Storage FlashArray//X
Pure Storage FlashArray//X

An all-NVMe enterprise flash array engineered for Tier-1 application performance and availability.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000 excels in ultra‑low latency and linear scaling for edge/data‑center workloads, while NetApp FAS2700 offers broader SAN/NAS support and built‑in data reduction for midsize enterprises.

Key differences

  • •Latency & scaling: HyperSF 1000 provides sub‑microsecond latency and linear performance scaling via clustering; FAS2700 does not specify latency or scaling.
  • •Data tiering: HyperSF 1000 tiers cold data to high‑capacity SSDs internally; FAS2700 automatically tiers inactive data to cloud storage.
  • •Form factor & weight: HyperSF 1000 is lighter (8 kg) and slightly smaller; FAS2700 is heavier (24.5 kg) but similar rack height.
  • •Connectivity focus: HyperSF 1000 emphasizes NVMe‑over‑Fabric (10/25 GbE, NVMe‑oF); FAS2700 provides diverse SAN/NAS ports (10 GbE, 1 GbE, 16/32 Gb FC, 12 Gb SAS).
  • •Management: HyperSF 1000 offers a REST API for automation; FAS2700 relies on ONTAP software with snapshots and hybrid cloud features.
DimensionWinner

Performance

HyperSF 1000 advertises up to 200 GB/s aggregate throughput and sub‑microsecond latency; FAS2700 performance not quantified.

ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

Build quality

HyperSF 1000 ruggedized enclosure rated for 40 °C and 10 k‑hour MTBF; FAS2700 build specs not provided.

ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

Connectivity

FAS2700 offers more protocol options (FC, SAS, 1 GbE) beyond HyperSF's 10/25 GbE and NVMe‑oF.

NetApp FAS2700

Power & efficiency

HyperSF 1000 is lighter (8 kg) suggesting lower power draw; exact power consumption not specified for either.

ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000

Compatibility

FAS2700 supports both SAN and NAS workloads and integrates with ONTAP; HyperSF focuses on NVMe‑based block storage.

NetApp FAS2700

Pricing & value

Pricing not specified for either product; cannot determine value.

Tie

Warranty & support

FAS2700 includes a 3‑year standard hardware warranty; HyperSF 1000 offers 2‑year warranty.

NetApp FAS2700

Choose NetApp FAS2700 if…

Midsize businesses requiring unified SAN/NAS, strong data reduction, and hybrid cloud tiering with broader protocol support.

Choose ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000 if…

Enterprises needing ultra‑low latency, linear scaling, and hot‑swappable NVMe drives for edge or data‑center workloads.

Common questions

Which system offers better latency for high‑performance applications?

ScaleFlux HyperSF 1000 claims sub‑microsecond latency; NetApp FAS2700 does not provide latency figures.

Can either product be used for both block and file storage?

FAS2700 supports both SAN (block) and NAS (file) via ONTAP; HyperSF 1000 is focused on NVMe block storage.

What are the warranty differences?

HyperSF 1000 includes a 2‑year warranty; FAS2700 includes a 3‑year standard hardware warranty.