FindAlternative
Back to Google Meet

Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Google Meet
Google MeetVideo meetings built into Google Workspace.
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft TeamsChat, meetings, and file collaboration built into Microsoft 365.
Overview
Description

Google Meet is Google Workspace's video conferencing tool, designed for quick, browser-based meetings without requiring any software installation. It is deeply integrated with Gmail and Google Calendar, so meetings can be started or joined directly from an event invite in one click. Meet includes noise cancellation, live captions, and virtual backgrounds, plus adaptive layouts that automatically adjust the video grid based on the number of participants and who is speaking. For Workspace customers, Meet also offers meeting recording to Google Drive, breakout rooms, and polls, making it a capable option for both internal syncs and larger training sessions.

Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration platform bundled with Microsoft 365, combining chat, video meetings, and file sharing built directly on top of SharePoint and OneDrive. It is the default hub for meetings and internal messaging at organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365. Teams organizes work into teams and channels similar to other chat platforms, but is distinguished by tight integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Planner, allowing documents to be co-authored directly inside a channel without leaving the app. Meetings support up to thousands of attendees with features like live captions, together mode, and background noise suppression, making Teams a common choice for both daily standups and large all-hands meetings.

Pricing
Freemium

Free with a Google account; advanced features included in Google Workspace plans from $6/user/month.

Freemium

Free tier available; included with Microsoft 365 Business plans from $6/user/month.

Category
Video Conferencing
Team Chat
Best for
Google Workspace users and small teams
Enterprises using Microsoft 365
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Web, Mac, Windows, iOS, Android
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Help Center
Help Center, Enterprise Support
key integrations
Google Calendar, Gmail, Google Drive
Outlook, SharePoint, Excel, Planner
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • No software installation required
  • Tight Gmail/Calendar integration
  • Good live caption accuracy
  • Clean, simple interface
  • Deep Office 365 integration
  • Scales to very large meetings
  • Strong enterprise admin controls
  • Included with many M365 plans
Cons
  • Fewer advanced features than Zoom
  • Free tier limited to 60-minute group calls
  • Recording requires a paid Workspace plan
  • Interface can feel cluttered
  • Can be resource-heavy on older machines
  • Channel organization less intuitive than competitors
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
3
7
User rating
3.8 (4)
4.5 (4)

What reviewers say

Google Meet Reviews

3.8 (4)
Anonymous

Solid choice

Google Meet has quickly become part of our daily workflow. No software installation required. One minor gripe: fewer advanced features than zoom, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Anonymous

Does exactly what we need

Been a daily user of Google Meet for a while now. Tight Gmail/Calendar integration. One minor gripe: free tier limited to 60-minute group calls, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Anonymous

Does exactly what we need

We've been using Google Meet for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference for our team. Clean, simple interface. One minor gripe: recording requires a paid workspace plan, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Read all reviews โ†’

Microsoft Teams Reviews

4.5 (4)
Anonymous

Highly recommend Microsoft Teams

We've been using Microsoft Teams for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference for our team. Strong enterprise admin controls. One minor gripe: can be resource-heavy on older machines, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Anonymous

Great tool for communication

Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Scales to very large meetings. One minor gripe: interface can feel cluttered, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Anonymous

Highly recommend Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Strong enterprise admin controls. No major complaints so far. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Read all reviews โ†’

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Google Meet

View all โ†’
Zoom
Zoom

Reliable video conferencing for meetings, webinars, and rooms.

Compare
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

Chat, meetings, and file collaboration built into Microsoft 365.

Compare
Slack
Slack

Where work happens

Compare
Discord
Discord

Voice, video, and text chat for communities.

Compare

Alternatives to Microsoft Teams

View all โ†’
Slack
Slack

Where work happens

Compare
Google Meet
Google Meet

Video meetings built into Google Workspace.

Compare
Zoom
Zoom

Reliable video conferencing for meetings, webinars, and rooms.

Compare
Discord
Discord

Voice, video, and text chat for communities.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Google Meet is the safer default for small teams already on Google Workspace, while Microsoft Teams shines for enterprises needing deep Office 365 integration and massive meeting capacity.

Key differences

  • โ€ขGoogle Meet offers browserโ€‘only, noโ€‘download meetings; Teams requires a client for full feature set.
  • โ€ขMeetโ€™s free tier caps group calls at 60โ€ฏminutes; Teamsโ€™ free tier allows longer meetings.
  • โ€ขTeams supports up to 10,000 attendees and webinars; Meet caps at far smaller groups.
  • โ€ขMeet integrates tightly with Gmail/Calendar/Drive; Teams integrates with Outlook, SharePoint, and Office apps.
  • โ€ขTeams provides richer admin controls and enterprise support options; Meetโ€™s support is limited to a Help Center.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both have free tiers; paid plans start at $6/user/month in their respective suites.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Meet is browserโ€‘based with oneโ€‘click Calendar join, no client install; Teams can feel cluttered and resourceโ€‘heavy.

Google Meet

Features & depth

Teams offers webinars for 10,000, coโ€‘authoring, Together mode, and broader admin controls.

Microsoft Teams

Integrations & ecosystem

Teams embeds with Outlook, SharePoint, Excel, Planner; Meet focuses on Gmail, Calendar, Drive.

Microsoft Teams

Collaboration

Teams provides channel chat, file storage via SharePoint, and Office coโ€‘authoring; Meet lacks builtโ€‘in persistent chat.

Microsoft Teams

Scalability

Teams supports meetings up to 10,000 attendees; Meetโ€™s group limit is much lower and free tier 60โ€ฏmin.

Microsoft Teams

Support

Teams offers Help Center plus Enterprise Support; Meet only provides a Help Center.

Microsoft Teams

Choose Google Meet ifโ€ฆ

Small teams or organizations already using Google Workspace who need quick, noโ€‘install video calls.

Choose Microsoft Teams ifโ€ฆ

Enterprises or larger groups using Microsoft 365 that require deep Office integration, largeโ€‘scale webinars, and stronger admin controls.

Common questions

Can I record meetings on the free tier?

Meet requires a paid Workspace plan to record; Teams allows recording on paid Microsoft 365 plans only.

Which platform supports the largest meetings?

Microsoft Teams supports up to 10,000 attendees; Google Meetโ€™s limit is far lower and not specified.

Do I need to install software to join meetings?

Google Meet works entirely in a web browser; Teams offers a web option but full features need the desktop client.