Microsoft Teams vs Zoom
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration platform bundled with Microsoft 365, combining chat, video meetings, and file sharing built directly on top of SharePoint and OneDrive. It is the default hub for meetings and internal messaging at organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365. Teams organizes work into teams and channels similar to other chat platforms, but is distinguished by tight integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Planner, allowing documents to be co-authored directly inside a channel without leaving the app. Meetings support up to thousands of attendees with features like live captions, together mode, and background noise suppression, making Teams a common choice for both daily standups and large all-hands meetings.
Zoom is a video communications platform known for reliable, low-latency video calls that scale from one-on-one meetings to large webinars and virtual events. It became a household name during remote-work adoption and remains a default choice for external client calls and conferences. Beyond core meetings, the Zoom Workplace suite bundles team chat, whiteboarding, and Zoom Phone for VoIP calling, positioning it as a broader collaboration platform rather than just a meetings app. AI Companion, Zoom's built-in assistant, provides meeting summaries, smart chapters, and follow-up task suggestions automatically after calls end.
Free tier available; included with Microsoft 365 Business plans from $6/user/month.
Free for meetings up to 40 minutes; paid plans start at $13.33/user/month.
- Deep Office 365 integration
- Scales to very large meetings
- Strong enterprise admin controls
- Included with many M365 plans
- Very reliable connection quality
- Simple, familiar interface
- Strong webinar features
- Good screen sharing and annotation
- Interface can feel cluttered
- Can be resource-heavy on older machines
- Channel organization less intuitive than competitors
- Free plan 40-minute limit on group calls
- Additional cost for Phone and Webinar add-ons
- History of past security/privacy scrutiny
What reviewers say
Microsoft Teams Reviews
4.5 (4)Highly recommend Microsoft Teams
We've been using Microsoft Teams for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference for our team. Strong enterprise admin controls. One minor gripe: can be resource-heavy on older machines, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Great tool for communication
Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Scales to very large meetings. One minor gripe: interface can feel cluttered, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Highly recommend Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Strong enterprise admin controls. No major complaints so far. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Zoom Reviews
4.0 (2)Works, with some caveats
Zoom is solid overall, though it's not perfect. On the plus side, strong webinar features. That said, additional cost for phone and webinar add-ons, which held us back from rating it higher.
Highly recommend Zoom
Zoom has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Good screen sharing and annotation. No major complaints so far. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Microsoft Teams
View all โAlternatives to Zoom
View all โThe Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataZoom is the safer default for straightforward video meetings and webinars, while Teams adds deep Office 365 collaboration at the cost of a heavier interface.
Key differences
- โขZoom caps free group calls at 40 minutes; Teams free tier has no such limit.
- โขZoomโs webinar capacity is 50,000 viewโonly attendees; Teams webinars top out at 10,000.
- โขTeams embeds Word, Excel, PowerPoint coโauthoring and SharePoint file storage; Zoom relies on external integrations.
- โขZoom includes a dedicated AI Companion for meeting summaries; Teams offers live captions/translation but no AI summary tool.
Pricing & value
Zoomโs free tier is limited to 40โminute group calls; Teams free tier allows unlimited meetings, but paid Teams is bundled with M365 starting at $6/user.
Ease of use / learning curve
Zoomโs interface is simple and familiar, whereas Teams can feel cluttered and resourceโheavy on older machines.
Features & depth
Teams provides deep Office coโauthoring, channel chat, and live captions; Zoom focuses on video quality and webinars, with fewer native document tools.
Integrations & ecosystem
Teams integrates natively with Outlook, SharePoint, Excel, Planner; Zoom integrates via APIs with Slack, Google Calendar, Salesforce but lacks native Office suite ties.
Collaboration
Teamsโ channelโbased chat and SharePoint file storage enable continuous collaboration; Zoom offers whiteboard and screen sharing but less persistent collaboration.
Scalability
Zoom webinars support up to 50,000 viewโonly attendees; Teams webinars max out at 10,000.
Support
Zoom provides 24/7 support on paid plans; Teams offers Enterprise Support but only to qualifying M365 customers.
Choose Microsoft Teams ifโฆ
Enterprises already on Microsoft 365 that want integrated document coโauthoring and persistent team channels.
Choose Zoom ifโฆ
Businesses needing reliable, highโcapacity webinars and a simple meeting UI, without deep Office integration.
Common questions
Which tool allows larger webinars?
Zoom supports up to 50,000 viewโonly attendees; Teams caps webinars at 10,000.
Can I run unlimited free meetings?
Teams free tier has no time limit; Zoom free tier limits group calls to 40 minutes.
Do I need additional apps for Office document collaboration?
Teams includes native Word, Excel, PowerPoint coโauthoring; Zoom requires external integrations for those functions.
