FindAlternative
Back to Mattermost

Mattermost vs Rocket.Chat

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Mattermost
MattermostSecure, self-hosted team messaging and collaboration.
Rocket.Chat
Rocket.ChatSecure CommsOS for mission-critical operations
Overview
Description

Mattermost is an open-source, self‑hostable platform that lets teams communicate in real time while keeping data under their own control. It offers channels, direct messages, and rich media sharing, all designed for privacy‑focused organizations. The platform integrates with developer tools, supports custom plugins, and can be deployed on‑premises or in the cloud, making it a flexible alternative to commercial chat solutions.

Rocket.Chat is an open-source communication platform designed for mission-critical operations. It provides a secure and scalable solution for team collaboration, featuring real-time messaging, video conferencing, and file sharing.

Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Freemium
Category
Messaging Apps
Team Chat
Best for
Enterprises and remote development teams
Enterprise teams and organizations
Specifications
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community forum, Email, Paid enterprise support
Email, Live Chat, 24/7 Support
key integrations
GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Jenkins, Azure DevOps
Slack, Notion, GitHub, Jira, and more
deployment
—
Self-hosted
github stars
—
45,921
primary language
—
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Full data ownership with self‑hosting options.
  • Open-source code allows extensive customization.
  • Rich integration ecosystem for developer tools.
  • Cross‑platform clients ensure accessibility.
  • Highly customizable and extensible
  • Scalable architecture for large teams and organizations
  • End-to-end encryption for secure communication
  • Wide range of integrations with external services
Cons
  • Self‑hosting requires infrastructure and maintenance expertise.
  • Advanced enterprise features are behind a paid tier.
  • User interface can feel less polished than some commercial rivals.
  • Steep learning curve for administrators
  • Limited support for certain features in the free version
  • Requires technical expertise for customization and integration
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Mattermost

View all →
Workplace from Meta
Workplace from Meta

Secure, familiar communication and collaboration for modern teams

Compare
Threema
Threema

End-to-end encrypted messaging that never requires a phone number

Compare
Rocket.Chat
Rocket.Chat

Secure CommsOS for mission-critical operations

Compare

Alternatives to Rocket.Chat

View all →
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

Chat, meetings, and file collaboration built into Microsoft 365.

Compare
element-web
element-web

A glossy Matrix collaboration client for the web

Compare
Mattermost
Mattermost

Secure, self-hosted team messaging and collaboration.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Rocket.Chat offers broader collaboration features (video, screen‑share, recording) and stronger out‑of‑the‑box support, while Mattermost focuses on developer‑centric messaging with a leaner UI and community‑driven support.

Key differences

  • •Rocket.Chat includes built‑in video conferencing and recording; Mattermost does not.
  • •Rocket.Chat provides 24/7 support options; Mattermost relies mainly on community forums and paid enterprise support.
  • •Mattermost emphasizes developer tool integrations (GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps) whereas Rocket.Chat highlights broader business integrations (Slack, Notion).
  • •Rocket.Chat is noted as having a steep admin learning curve; Mattermost’s UI is considered less polished but generally easier to adopt.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both products use a freemium model; no pricing details beyond that are provided.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Mattermost’s UI is less polished but lacks the steep admin learning curve cited for Rocket.Chat.

Mattermost

Features & depth

Rocket.Chat includes video conferencing, screen sharing, and recording; Mattermost’s feature list stops at messaging and file sharing.

Rocket.Chat

Integrations & ecosystem

Both list multiple integrations with major dev and business tools; neither is shown to dominate.

Tie

Collaboration

Rocket.Chat’s real‑time messaging, file sharing, screen sharing, and video conferencing give richer collaboration capabilities.

Rocket.Chat

Scalability

Rocket.Chat explicitly mentions a scalable architecture for large teams; Mattermost provides no scalability claim.

Rocket.Chat

Support

Rocket.Chat offers email, live chat, and 24/7 support; Mattermost lists community forum, email, and optional paid enterprise support.

Rocket.Chat

Security & privacy

Rocket.Chat states end‑to‑end encryption; Mattermost mentions data control and compliance but not explicit encryption.

Rocket.Chat

Choose Mattermost if…

Developer‑focused teams wanting self‑hosted messaging with deep dev‑tool integrations and are comfortable with community support.

Choose Rocket.Chat if…

Enterprises needing video calls, strong security, and 24/7 support, and able to manage a steeper admin learning curve.

Common questions

Can either product be self‑hosted?

Both Rocket.Chat and Mattermost are open‑source and support self‑hosting.

Which tool provides built‑in video conferencing?

Rocket.Chat includes video conferencing with screen sharing and recording; Mattermost does not list video features.

What support is available for free users?

Rocket.Chat offers email, live chat, and 24/7 support; Mattermost provides community forum and email, with paid enterprise support optional.