FindAlternative
Back to Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Rocket.Chat

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft TeamsChat, meetings, and file collaboration built into Microsoft 365.
Rocket.Chat
Rocket.ChatSecure CommsOS for mission-critical operations
Overview
Description

Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration platform bundled with Microsoft 365, combining chat, video meetings, and file sharing built directly on top of SharePoint and OneDrive. It is the default hub for meetings and internal messaging at organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365. Teams organizes work into teams and channels similar to other chat platforms, but is distinguished by tight integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Planner, allowing documents to be co-authored directly inside a channel without leaving the app. Meetings support up to thousands of attendees with features like live captions, together mode, and background noise suppression, making Teams a common choice for both daily standups and large all-hands meetings.

Rocket.Chat is an open-source communication platform designed for mission-critical operations. It provides a secure and scalable solution for team collaboration, featuring real-time messaging, video conferencing, and file sharing.

Pricing
Freemium

Free tier available; included with Microsoft 365 Business plans from $6/user/month.

Freemium
Category
Team Chat
Team Chat
Best for
Enterprises using Microsoft 365
Enterprise teams and organizations
Specifications
platforms
Web, Mac, Windows, iOS, Android
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Self-hosted
open source
No
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Help Center, Enterprise Support
Email, Live Chat, 24/7 Support
key integrations
Outlook, SharePoint, Excel, Planner
Slack, Notion, GitHub, Jira, and more
github stars
45,921
primary language
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Deep Office 365 integration
  • Scales to very large meetings
  • Strong enterprise admin controls
  • Included with many M365 plans
  • Highly customizable and extensible
  • Scalable architecture for large teams and organizations
  • End-to-end encryption for secure communication
  • Wide range of integrations with external services
Cons
  • Interface can feel cluttered
  • Can be resource-heavy on older machines
  • Channel organization less intuitive than competitors
  • Steep learning curve for administrators
  • Limited support for certain features in the free version
  • Requires technical expertise for customization and integration
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
7
0
User rating
4.5 (4)
Not enough data

What reviewers say

Microsoft Teams Reviews

4.5 (4)
Verified User

Highly recommend Microsoft Teams

We've been using Microsoft Teams for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference for our team. Strong enterprise admin controls. One minor gripe: can be resource-heavy on older machines, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Verified User

Great tool for communication

Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Scales to very large meetings. One minor gripe: interface can feel cluttered, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Verified User

Highly recommend Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Strong enterprise admin controls. No major complaints so far. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Read all reviews →

Rocket.Chat Reviews

No reviews yet.

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Microsoft Teams

View all →
Discord
Discord

Voice, video, and text chat for communities.

Compare
Slack
Slack

Where work happens

Compare
Skype
Skype

Retired by Microsoft in May 2025; users are directed to Microsoft Teams.

Compare
Zoom
Zoom

Reliable video conferencing for meetings, webinars, and rooms.

Compare

Alternatives to Rocket.Chat

View all →
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

Chat, meetings, and file collaboration built into Microsoft 365.

Compare
element-web
element-web

A glossy Matrix collaboration client for the web

Compare
Mattermost
Mattermost

Secure, self-hosted team messaging and collaboration.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Microsoft Teams is the safer default for organizations already on Microsoft 365, while Rocket.Chat offers deeper security and customization at the cost of admin complexity.

Key differences

  • Deployment model: Teams is cloud SaaS, Rocket.Chat is self‑hosted.
  • Security: Rocket.Chat provides end‑to‑end encryption; Teams does not list it.
  • Integration focus: Teams ties tightly to Office apps; Rocket.Chat integrates broadly via webhooks and external services.
  • Admin overhead: Teams has built‑in enterprise controls; Rocket.Chat requires technical expertise to configure.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both freemium, but Teams is included with many M365 plans starting $6/user, reducing incremental cost.

Microsoft Teams

Ease of use / learning curve

Teams offers familiar Office UI; Rocket.Chat has a steep admin learning curve.

Microsoft Teams

Features & depth

Teams supports up to 10,000 attendees, live captions, and deep Office co‑authoring.

Microsoft Teams

Integrations & ecosystem

Both have strong integrations: Teams with Outlook/SharePoint; Rocket.Chat with Slack, GitHub, Jira, etc.

Tie

Collaboration

Teams provides channel‑based chat linked to SharePoint storage and robust meeting tools.

Microsoft Teams

Scalability

Teams handles webinars of 10,000+; Rocket.Chat scales but requires self‑hosting resources.

Microsoft Teams

Support

Rocket.Chat offers 24/7 live chat and email; Teams support limited to Help Center unless enterprise plan.

Rocket.Chat

Security & privacy

Rocket.Chat offers end‑to‑end encryption and multiple auth methods; Teams does not specify E2EE.

Rocket.Chat

Migration / lock‑in

Rocket.Chat is open source and self‑hosted, allowing data export; Teams ties data to Microsoft cloud.

Rocket.Chat

Choose Microsoft Teams if…

Enterprises already using Microsoft 365 needing seamless Office integration and large‑scale meetings.

Choose Rocket.Chat if…

Security‑focused teams willing to manage self‑hosting and custom integrations.

Common questions

Can I use the free tier of each product for a small team?

Yes, both Teams and Rocket.Chat offer freemium tiers.

Which solution provides end‑to‑end encryption?

Rocket.Chat includes end‑to‑end encryption; Teams does not list this feature.

Do I need to host the software myself?

Teams is cloud SaaS; Rocket.Chat requires self‑hosting.