FindAlternative
Back to QNAP TS-464

QNAP TS-464 vs Synology DiskStation DS925+

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
QNAP TS-464
QNAP TS-464Four-bay desktop NAS with advanced connectivity and hardware transcoding
Synology DiskStation DS925+
Synology DiskStation DS925+Powerful 4‑bay NAS with Ryzen performance and 10 GbE upgrade path.
Overview
Description

The QNAP TS-464 is a four-bay desktop NAS designed for home and small business users. It features dual 2.5GbE ports for high-speed networking, a PCIe expansion slot for adding additional functionality, and hardware transcoding for efficient video processing. With its compact design and quiet operation, the TS-464 is an ideal solution for those looking for a reliable and feature-rich NAS.

The DS925+ is a four‑bay desktop NAS that runs on a quad‑core AMD Ryzen processor, delivering fast file transfers and smooth multitasking for multiple users. It ships with Synology’s DiskStation Manager (DSM) operating system, offering a rich suite of apps for backup, file sharing, media streaming, and more. Designed for scalability, the unit supports up to 64 TB of raw storage and can be expanded with a PCIe 3.0 x4 slot for optional 10 GbE networking. Energy‑efficient features such as scheduled power‑on/off and fan speed control help keep operating costs low while providing enterprise‑grade data protection.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
NAS Devices
NAS Devices
Best for
Home users and small business owners
SMBs, prosumers, and home office users
Specifications
General
msrp
$599
$549−8%
Specifications
weight
3.5 kg+59%
2.2 kg
warranty
2 years
2 years
dimensions
177 x 225 x 142 mm+7%
166 x 199 x 223 mm
open source
No
No
connectivity
Dual 2.5GbE, USB 3.2 Gen 2, USB 2.0
2 x 1GbE RJ45, 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 (10GbE)
power source
AC Powered
AC Powered
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High-speed networking with dual 2.5GbE ports
  • Flexible storage options with 4-bay design
  • Efficient video processing with hardware transcoding
  • Compact and quiet design suitable for home or small office use
  • High-performance Ryzen CPU for demanding workloads
  • Expandable 10 GbE networking via PCIe slot
  • Comprehensive DSM app ecosystem
  • Flexible RAID and Btrfs snapshot protection
Cons
  • Limited scalability with only 4 bays
  • No built-in Wi-Fi or 10GbE support
  • Requires technical expertise for setup and configuration
  • No built‑in 10 GbE port, requires separate expansion card
  • No Wi‑Fi or Bluetooth connectivity
  • Higher price point compared to basic 4‑bay NAS
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to QNAP TS-464

View all →
Synology DiskStation DS925+
Synology DiskStation DS925+

Powerful 4‑bay NAS with Ryzen performance and 10 GbE upgrade path.

Compare
Rock Pi 4
Rock Pi 4

Powerful SBC with RK3399 for AI and edge computing

Compare
Synology DS923+
Synology DS923+

A 4-bay NAS for home and small-business network storage.

Compare
ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen3
ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen3

High‑performance 6‑bay NAS with AMD Ryzen CPU, 10 GbE and NVMe cache

Compare

Alternatives to Synology DiskStation DS925+

View all →
QNAP TS-464
QNAP TS-464

Four-bay desktop NAS with advanced connectivity and hardware transcoding

Compare
Synology DS923+
Synology DS923+

A 4-bay NAS for home and small-business network storage.

Compare
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro

Four-bay NAS for professionals and businesses

Compare
ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen3
ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen3

High‑performance 6‑bay NAS with AMD Ryzen CPU, 10 GbE and NVMe cache

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

The QNAP TS-464 offers built‑in 2.5 GbE and hardware transcoding out of the box, while the Synology DS925+ provides a faster Ryzen CPU and optional 10 GbE via PCIe, but at a slightly lower base price.

Key differences

  • •QNAP includes dual 2.5 GbE ports; Synology only has 1 GbE ports and needs a PCIe card for 10 GbE.
  • •QNAP’s hardware transcoding is built‑in; Synology relies on CPU power and lacks dedicated transcoding hardware.
  • •Synology uses a quad‑core AMD Ryzen CPU, delivering higher raw processing performance than QNAP’s unspecified CPU.
  • •QNAP is heavier and larger (3.5 kg, 177 × 225 × 142 mm) versus Synology’s lighter, more compact chassis (2.2 kg, 166 × 199 × 223 mm).
  • •Base MSRP: QNAP $599 vs Synology $549, making Synology cheaper initially but requiring extra cost for a 10 GbE card if needed.
DimensionWinner

Performance

Synology’s quad‑core AMD Ryzen CPU gives higher processing power than QNAP’s unspecified CPU.

Synology DiskStation DS925+

Build quality

QNAP’s larger, heavier chassis (3.5 kg) suggests a more robust build than Synology’s 2.2 kg unit.

QNAP TS-464

Connectivity

QNAP provides dual 2.5 GbE out of the box; Synology only has 1 GbE and needs a PCIe card for 10 GbE.

QNAP TS-464

Power & efficiency

Synology mentions energy‑efficient design with scheduled power‑on/off and fan control; QNAP gives no such details.

Synology DiskStation DS925+

Compatibility

Both support up to four 3.5‑ or 2.5‑inch SATA drives and run proprietary, non‑open OS.

Tie

Price & value

Synology’s MSRP is $549, $50 cheaper than QNAP’s $599, though extra 10 GbE card may add cost.

Synology DiskStation DS925+

Warranty & support

Both offer a 2‑year warranty; no further differences specified.

Tie

Choose QNAP TS-464 if…

Home or small‑office users needing ready‑to‑use 2.5 GbE and video transcoding.

Choose Synology DiskStation DS925+ if…

Power users or SMBs wanting higher CPU performance and optional 10 GbE expansion.

Common questions

Which unit is cheaper initially?

Synology DS925+ costs $549 MSRP, $50 less than QNAP TS-464’s $599 MSRP.

Do I need extra hardware for 10 GbE?

Yes, Synology requires a PCIe 10 GbE card; QNAP already includes dual 2.5 GbE ports.

Is hardware video transcoding available?

QNAP TS-464 includes built‑in hardware transcoding; Synology DS925+ does not list dedicated transcoding hardware.