Box vs Thunar (XFCE)
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Box is a cloud content-management platform focused on enterprise security, compliance, and workflow, rather than just consumer file sync. It emphasizes governance, permissions, and integrations for business.
Thunar is the default file manager for the Xfce desktop environment, offering a clean interface and responsive performance on low‑resource systems. It integrates tightly with Xfce, providing drag‑and‑drop, custom actions, and seamless handling of MIME types. Designed for simplicity, Thunar supports tabbed browsing, bulk renaming, and extensible plugins, making everyday file operations quick and intuitive for both novice and power users.
Free personal tier; business plans from about $15/user/month.
- Strong enterprise security
- Good governance and compliance
- Wide integrations
- Workflow automation
- Very fast startup
- Low memory footprint
- Deep integration with Xfce
- Highly customizable
- Overkill for individuals
- Pricier than consumer options
- Interface less consumer-polished
- Limited to Linux platforms
- Feature set smaller than full‑featured managers like Nautilus
- No built‑in cloud storage integration
What reviewers say
Box Reviews
4.0 (3)Decent with caveats
Tried Box recently. Upside: workflow automation. Downside: overkill for individuals.
Great cloud-storage
We rolled out Box last quarter. Strong enterprise security. Minor gripe: overkill for individuals. Would recommend.
Great cloud-storage
Tried Box recently. Workflow automation. No real complaints. Would recommend.
Thunar (XFCE) Reviews
No reviews yet.
