FindAlternative
Back to Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood

Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood vs Call of Duty: World at War

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood
Brothers in Arms: Earned in BloodLead your squad through WWII's toughest battles with tactical precision and raw firepower
Call of Duty: World at War
Call of Duty: World at WarIntense WWII combat with gritty single‑player and co‑op action
Overview
Description

Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood puts you in the boots of a WWII infantry squad, blending intense first‑person shooting with realistic squad tactics. Set across the European theater, the game challenges you to coordinate fire, issue orders, and adapt to ever‑changing battlefield conditions. The campaign offers a gritty, story‑driven experience while the multiplayer modes let you test your strategic skills against friends or AI opponents. With authentic weapons, destructible environments, and a focus on teamwork, it delivers a historically grounded yet highly playable war experience.

Set during the final years of World War II, Call of Duty: World at War delivers a brutal, cinematic experience across the Pacific and Eastern Front. Players command squads in iconic battles, from the beaches of Iwo Jima to the streets of Stalingrad, with visceral gunplay and realistic environments. The game also introduced robust multiplayer modes, including co‑operative campaigns and split‑screen deathmatches, establishing a foundation for future titles in the franchise.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
First-Person Shooters
First-Person Shooters
Best for
Fans of tactical WWII shooters
WWII enthusiasts and FPS fans
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
General
msrp
$29.9950%
$59.99
release date
2005-10-06
2008-11-11
Specifications
developer
Gearbox Software
Treyarch
publisher
Ubisoft
Activision
age rating
ESRB M, PEGI 16
PEGI 18, ESRB M+13%
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer, Co-operative, Split screen
critic score
73/100
80/100+10%
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Deep squad command system
  • Authentic WWII weaponry and settings
  • Destructible environments add tactical depth
  • Strong single‑player narrative
  • Engaging historical storyline
  • Robust co‑op and split‑screen options
  • Varied multiplayer modes
  • Strong weapon authenticity
Cons
  • Graphics dated by modern standards
  • Multiplayer matchmaking can be inconsistent
  • Limited map variety
  • Graphics dated by modern standards
  • Limited map variety compared to later titles
  • Occasional AI pathing issues
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood

View all →
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30

Lead your squad through WWII’s toughest battles in a realistic tactical shooter

Compare
Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway
Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway

Lead your squad through the historic Battle of the Bulge.

Compare
Hidden & Dangerous 2
Hidden & Dangerous 2

Tactical WWII squad action with deep stealth and strategic combat

Compare
Hidden & Dangerous: Devil's Bridge
Hidden & Dangerous: Devil's Bridge

Lead your squad through WWII’s toughest covert ops

Compare

Alternatives to Call of Duty: World at War

View all →
Call of Duty 2
Call of Duty 2

Relive the epic battles of World War II with intense first‑person action.

Compare
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

A groundbreaking first‑person shooter that redefined modern combat gaming

Compare
Call of Duty
Call of Duty

World War II action shooter that set the standard for modern FPS games

Compare
Call of Duty 3
Call of Duty 3

Experience the brutal battles of WWII on the Western Front

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Call of Duty: World at War is the safer default choice for action-focused shooter fans, while Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood offers a deeper tactical squad-command experience at a lower price point.

Key differences

  • Price: Call of Duty: World at War costs $59.99 MSRP, whereas Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood is cheaper at $29.99 MSRP.
  • Co-op and Split-Screen: World at War features 2-player campaign co-op, local split-screen for up to 4 players, and the hidden 'Nazi Zombies' mode; Brothers in Arms supports cooperative and competitive missions up to 16 players.
  • Squad Mechanics: World at War uses AI-controlled squadmates that follow orders and provide tactical support, while Brothers in Arms lets you issue real-time orders to three squad members to suppress, flank, or hold positions.
  • Critical Reception: World at War holds an 80/100 critic score, compared to a 73/100 critic score for Brothers in Arms.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

World at War focuses on scripted set-pieces and fast-paced action with an 80/100 critic score, beating Brothers in Arms' 73/100 score.

Call of Duty: World at War

Platform availability

Cross-generation support is noted for World at War (PS3 and Xbox 360), while specific platform availability for Brothers in Arms is not specified.

Tie

Price & value

Brothers in Arms is the budget-friendly choice at an MSRP of $29.99, while World_at_War has an MSRP of $59.99.

Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood

Multiplayer / co-op

World at War includes 2-player story co-op, up to 4-player split-screen, varied deathmatch/objective modes, and the popular 'Nazi Zombies' mode.

Call of Duty: World at War

Content & replayability

World at War features historically based missions, authentic weaponry, and hidden co-op Nazi Zombies, outscoring Brothers in Arms critically.

Call of Duty: World at War

Difficulty & accessibility

World at War includes AI squadmates who follow orders in campaign missions; specific accessibility options are not specified for either game.

Call of Duty: World at War

Graphics & performance

Both games share the con of having graphics dated by modern standards.

Tie

Choose Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood if…

Shooter fans seeking a lower price point and deep, tactical squad-command gameplay.

Choose Call of Duty: World at War if…

Players wanting fast-paced WWII action, local split-screen, cooperative campaigns, and the 'Nazi Zombies' mode.

Common questions

Which game is less expensive?

Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood is less expensive with an MSRP of $29.99, compared to Call of Duty: World at War at $59.99.

Do both games feature multiplayer or co-op?

Yes, both feature multiplayer and co-op support, but World at War specifically includes local split-screen for up to four players and 'Nazi Zombies'.

How do the critic scores compare?

Call of Duty: World at War has a critic score of 80/100, while Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood has a critic score of 73/100.