Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood vs Call of Duty: World at War
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood puts you in the boots of a WWII infantry squad, blending intense first‑person shooting with realistic squad tactics. Set across the European theater, the game challenges you to coordinate fire, issue orders, and adapt to ever‑changing battlefield conditions. The campaign offers a gritty, story‑driven experience while the multiplayer modes let you test your strategic skills against friends or AI opponents. With authentic weapons, destructible environments, and a focus on teamwork, it delivers a historically grounded yet highly playable war experience.
Set during the final years of World War II, Call of Duty: World at War delivers a brutal, cinematic experience across the Pacific and Eastern Front. Players command squads in iconic battles, from the beaches of Iwo Jima to the streets of Stalingrad, with visceral gunplay and realistic environments. The game also introduced robust multiplayer modes, including co‑operative campaigns and split‑screen deathmatches, establishing a foundation for future titles in the franchise.
- Deep squad command system
- Authentic WWII weaponry and settings
- Destructible environments add tactical depth
- Strong single‑player narrative
- Engaging historical storyline
- Robust co‑op and split‑screen options
- Varied multiplayer modes
- Strong weapon authenticity
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Multiplayer matchmaking can be inconsistent
- Limited map variety
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Limited map variety compared to later titles
- Occasional AI pathing issues
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood
View all →
Lead your squad through WWII’s toughest battles in a realistic tactical shooter
Alternatives to Call of Duty: World at War
View all →
A groundbreaking first‑person shooter that redefined modern combat gaming
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataCall of Duty: World at War is the safer default choice for action-focused shooter fans, while Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood offers a deeper tactical squad-command experience at a lower price point.
Key differences
- •Price: Call of Duty: World at War costs $59.99 MSRP, whereas Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood is cheaper at $29.99 MSRP.
- •Co-op and Split-Screen: World at War features 2-player campaign co-op, local split-screen for up to 4 players, and the hidden 'Nazi Zombies' mode; Brothers in Arms supports cooperative and competitive missions up to 16 players.
- •Squad Mechanics: World at War uses AI-controlled squadmates that follow orders and provide tactical support, while Brothers in Arms lets you issue real-time orders to three squad members to suppress, flank, or hold positions.
- •Critical Reception: World at War holds an 80/100 critic score, compared to a 73/100 critic score for Brothers in Arms.
Gameplay & fun factor
World at War focuses on scripted set-pieces and fast-paced action with an 80/100 critic score, beating Brothers in Arms' 73/100 score.
Platform availability
Cross-generation support is noted for World at War (PS3 and Xbox 360), while specific platform availability for Brothers in Arms is not specified.
Price & value
Brothers in Arms is the budget-friendly choice at an MSRP of $29.99, while World_at_War has an MSRP of $59.99.
Multiplayer / co-op
World at War includes 2-player story co-op, up to 4-player split-screen, varied deathmatch/objective modes, and the popular 'Nazi Zombies' mode.
Content & replayability
World at War features historically based missions, authentic weaponry, and hidden co-op Nazi Zombies, outscoring Brothers in Arms critically.
Difficulty & accessibility
World at War includes AI squadmates who follow orders in campaign missions; specific accessibility options are not specified for either game.
Graphics & performance
Both games share the con of having graphics dated by modern standards.
Choose Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood if…
Shooter fans seeking a lower price point and deep, tactical squad-command gameplay.
Choose Call of Duty: World at War if…
Players wanting fast-paced WWII action, local split-screen, cooperative campaigns, and the 'Nazi Zombies' mode.
Common questions
Which game is less expensive?
Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood is less expensive with an MSRP of $29.99, compared to Call of Duty: World at War at $59.99.
Do both games feature multiplayer or co-op?
Yes, both feature multiplayer and co-op support, but World at War specifically includes local split-screen for up to four players and 'Nazi Zombies'.
How do the critic scores compare?
Call of Duty: World at War has a critic score of 80/100, while Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood has a critic score of 73/100.






