Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway vs Call of Duty: World at War
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway is a World War II first-person shooter that blends tactical squad commands with intense action. Set during the Battle of the Bulge, the game emphasizes realistic combat and authentic weaponry. Players experience a narrative-driven single-player campaign and robust multiplayer modes, offering both solo and cooperative challenges across PlayStation 3, PC, and Xbox 360.
Set during the final years of World War II, Call of Duty: World at War delivers a brutal, cinematic experience across the Pacific and Eastern Front. Players command squads in iconic battles, from the beaches of Iwo Jima to the streets of Stalingrad, with visceral gunplay and realistic environments. The game also introduced robust multiplayer modes, including co‑operative campaigns and split‑screen deathmatches, establishing a foundation for future titles in the franchise.
- Deep tactical squad control
- Authentic WWII weapons and settings
- Engaging single-player narrative
- Robust multiplayer options
- Engaging historical storyline
- Robust co‑op and split‑screen options
- Varied multiplayer modes
- Strong weapon authenticity
- Steep learning curve for commands
- Occasional AI pathfinding issues
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Limited map variety compared to later titles
- Occasional AI pathing issues
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway
View all →
Lead your squad through WWII's toughest battles with tactical precision and raw firepower
Lead your squad through WWII’s toughest battles in a realistic tactical shooter
Alternatives to Call of Duty: World at War
View all →
A groundbreaking first‑person shooter that redefined modern combat gaming
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataCall of Duty: World at War is the safer default choice for players prioritizing local split-screen and cooperative campaign play, while Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway leans into deeper tactical squad control and larger online multiplayer matches. The primary trade-off is between cooperative accessibility and strategic squad simulation.
Key differences
- •Co-op and Split-Screen: World at War supports 2-player campaign co-op, up to 4-player local split-screen, and includes the 'Nazi Zombies' mode, whereas Brothers in Arms lacks split-screen and campaign co-op features.
- •Multiplayer Scale: Brothers in Arms supports up to 24 players in competitive and cooperative modes, while World at War offers deathmatch, capture-the-flag, and objective-based modes without a specified player cap.
- •Squad Mechanics: Brothers in Arms focuses on real-time tactical squad control with issuing orders for fire, movement, and cover, compared to World at War where AI-controlled squadmates follow orders and provide tactical support.
- •Campaign Setting: World at War features historically based missions with scripted set-pieces, whereas Brothers in Arms focuses specifically on historical missions from the Battle of the Bulge with a branching single-player campaign.
Gameplay & fun factor
Both feature historical missions and dynamic environments, but World at War relies on scripted set-pieces while Brothers in Arms emphasizes real-time tactical squad orders.
Platform availability
Brothers in Arms is available on PS3, PC, and Xbox 360, whereas World at War supports cross-generation play on PS3 and Xbox 360 (PC is not specified in the facts).
Price & value
Both games share an identical MSRP of $59.99 as a paid, one-time purchase.
Multiplayer / co-op
World at War includes local 4-player split-screen, 2-player campaign co-op, and 'Nazi Zombies'. Brothers in Arms supports up to 24 players online but lacks split-screen.
Content & replayability
World at War features a hidden co-op 'Nazi Zombies' mode and varied multiplayer modes alongside its historical campaign.
Difficulty & accessibility
Brothers in Arms features a noted steep learning curve for its tactical commands, while World at War has AI squadmates that follow orders.
Graphics & performance
Both titles share the exact same con regarding graphics: they are dated by modern standards.
Choose Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway if…
Tactical strategy fans wanting deep squad control and up to 24-player online multiplayer.
Choose Call of Duty: World at War if…
Shooter fans wanting local split-screen, cooperative campaign play, and the 'Nazi Zombies' mode.
Common questions
Do both games cost the same?
Yes, both Call of Duty: World at War and Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway have an MSRP of $59.99 as paid one-time purchases.
Which game supports local split-screen?
Call of Duty: World at War supports local split-screen multiplayer for up to four players on consoles, while Brothers in Arms does not mention split-screen.
Can I play the campaign with a friend in both games?
In Call of Duty: World at War, two players can experience the entire single-player story together in co-op. Brothers in Arms does not feature campaign co-op.