FindAlternative
Back to Call of Duty: World at War

Call of Duty: World at War vs Medal of Honor: Warfighter

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Call of Duty: World at War
Call of Duty: World at WarIntense WWII combat with gritty single‑player and co‑op action
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Medal of Honor: WarfighterIntense modern warfare from the front lines
Overview
Description

Set during the final years of World War II, Call of Duty: World at War delivers a brutal, cinematic experience across the Pacific and Eastern Front. Players command squads in iconic battles, from the beaches of Iwo Jima to the streets of Stalingrad, with visceral gunplay and realistic environments. The game also introduced robust multiplayer modes, including co‑operative campaigns and split‑screen deathmatches, establishing a foundation for future titles in the franchise.

Medal of Honor: Warfighter puts players in the boots of an elite U.S. Special Forces operative during the War on Terror, delivering a gritty single‑player campaign across global hotspots. The game blends cinematic storytelling with fast‑paced combat, emphasizing realistic weapons and tactical movement. The multiplayer experience expands the battlefield with competitive modes, customizable load‑outs, and a progression system that rewards skill and teamwork. Designed for PlayStation 3, Xbox 360, and PC, Warfighter offers both solo and online action for fans of modern shooters.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
First-Person Shooters
First-Person Shooters
Best for
WWII enthusiasts and FPS fans
Military shooter enthusiasts
Specifications
General
msrp
$59.99
$59.99
release date
2008-11-11
2012-10-23
Specifications
developer
Treyarch
Danger Close
publisher
Activision
Electronic Arts
age rating
PEGI 18, ESRB M+13%
PEGI 16, ESRB M
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer, Co-operative, Split screen
Single player, Multiplayer
critic score
80/100+63%
49/100
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Engaging historical storyline
  • Robust co‑op and split‑screen options
  • Varied multiplayer modes
  • Strong weapon authenticity
  • Authentic modern military weapons and gear
  • Varied multiplayer modes
  • Detailed environments with destructible elements
  • Cross‑platform availability
Cons
  • Graphics dated by modern standards
  • Limited map variety compared to later titles
  • Occasional AI pathing issues
  • Inconsistent AI behavior
  • Technical issues on launch
  • Limited post‑launch content updates
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Call of Duty: World at War

View all →
Call of Duty 2
Call of Duty 2

Relive the epic battles of World War II with intense first‑person action.

Compare
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

A groundbreaking first‑person shooter that redefined modern combat gaming

Compare
Call of Duty
Call of Duty

World War II action shooter that set the standard for modern FPS games

Compare
Call of Duty 3
Call of Duty 3

Experience the brutal battles of WWII on the Western Front

Compare

Alternatives to Medal of Honor: Warfighter

View all →
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Intense global warfare in a fast‑paced shooter experience.

Compare
Battlefield 2: Special Forces
Battlefield 2: Special Forces

Lead elite squads in intense modern warfare battles

Compare
Commandos: Strike Force
Commandos: Strike Force

Tactical WWII shooter blending stealth and action for intense squad missions

Compare
Delta Force: Xtreme
Delta Force: Xtreme

Experience ultra‑realistic tactical combat in the ultimate military shooter

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Call of Duty: World at War is the safer default thanks to a higher critic score and robust co‑op/split‑screen modes, while Medal of Honor: Warfighter offers a modern setting with deep weapon customization but lower reviews.

Key differences

  • World at War is set in WWII; Warfighter is modern Afghanistan/Pakistan.
  • World at War includes full campaign co‑op and split‑screen; Warfighter lacks co‑op.
  • Critic scores differ sharply: 80/100 vs 49/100.
  • Warfighter provides extensive weapon customization; World at War does not.
  • Warfighter supports PC in addition to PS3/Xbox360; World at War is console‑only.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

World at War offers varied multiplayer modes, a popular Zombies mode, and higher critic score indicating stronger overall fun.

Call of Duty: World at War

Platform availability

Warfighter runs on PS3, Xbox360, and PC, whereas World at War is limited to PS3 and Xbox360.

Medal of Honor: Warfighter

Price & value

Both titles retail at $59.99 with a one‑time purchase.

Tie

Multiplayer / co‑op

World at War supports two‑player campaign co‑op and up to four‑player split‑screen; Warfighter only offers multiplayer.

Call of Duty: World at War

Content & replayability

World at War includes campaign, co‑op, split‑screen, and Zombies mode; Warfighter has limited post‑launch content.

Call of Duty: World at War

Difficulty & accessibility

No specific difficulty or accessibility data provided for either game.

Tie

Graphics & performance

Warfighter benefits from newer engine but suffers launch technical issues; World at War graphics are dated.

Medal of Honor: Warfighter

Choose Call of Duty: World at War if…

WWII enthusiasts who want solid co‑op, split‑screen and higher critical reception.

Choose Medal of Honor: Warfighter if…

Players seeking modern military combat with deep weapon customization and PC play.

Common questions

Is there a split‑screen option?

Yes, World at War supports split‑screen for up to four players; Warfighter does not.

Which game has better reviews?

World at War has a critic score of 80/100, while Warfighter scores 49/100.

Can I play on PC?

Warfighter is available on PC; World at War is only on PS3 and Xbox 360.