FindAlternative
Back to nTask

nTask vs worklenz

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
nTask
nTaskAll-in-one task and project management platform with Gantt, risk, and issue tracking.
worklenz
worklenzAll‑in‑one open‑source project management for teams and agencies
Overview
Description

nTask is a project and task management platform aimed at teams that need planning, meeting management, and risk tracking in a single tool. It combines Kanban boards and Gantt charts with less common features like formal risk matrices and issue tracking, alongside timesheets and team chat.

Worklenz is a free, open-source project management platform for teams and agencies, bringing projects, tasks, resource planning, and client collaboration into one workspace. Tasks can be viewed as a list, a Kanban board, or a Gantt chart, and time is logged directly against them. Alongside delivery it tracks budgets, costs, and team utilization, so project health and profitability stay visible. Worklenz can be self-hosted under AGPL-3.0 or used as a managed cloud service that has a free plan.

Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Category
Project Management
Project Management
Best for
Small to mid-size teams needing task, meeting, and risk management in one tool
Agencies, professional services firms, and project teams
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Self-hosted
open source
No
Yes
api available
No
Yes
key integrations
1,000+ apps via Zapier
—
github stars
—
3,114
support options
—
Email, Live Chat
primary language
—
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Includes risk management and issue tracking not found in many competitors
  • Low entry price on paid tiers ($3-$8/user/month)
  • Free plan covers small teams up to 5 members
  • Meeting management is built in, not a separate add-on
  • Free and open-source under AGPL-3.0, with a self-hostable Community edition
  • Covers projects, tasks, resources, and budgets in one workspace
  • Multiple task views including list, Kanban board, and Gantt
  • Time logged directly on tasks feeds utilization and profitability reporting
Cons
  • Free tier is capped at 5 team members
  • Interface and feature depth can feel less polished than larger competitors
  • Enterprise pricing is not published
  • Free cloud plan is capped at three active projects
  • Self-hosting means running and maintaining your own Docker, Postgres, and storage stack
  • Mobile access is through the web app; there are no native iOS or Android apps
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to nTask

View all →
worklenz
worklenz

All‑in‑one open‑source project management for teams and agencies

Compare
Zenkit
Zenkit

All-in-one work and project management platform with Kanban, Gantt, chat, and 100+ report views.

Compare
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com

AI-powered project and resource management built for client-services profitability

Compare

Alternatives to worklenz

View all →
SolidTime
SolidTime

Time tracking and invoicing for freelancers and small teams

Compare
OpenProject
OpenProject

Free and open source project management software

Compare
Huly
Huly

An open-source, all-in-one project management platform combining issues, chat, and docs.

Compare
Leantime
Leantime

Open-source project management for small teams and freelancers

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Worklenz offers open‑source, self‑hosted project management with built‑in budgeting and resource planning, while nTask provides a cloud SaaS focused on task, risk, and meeting management with extensive Zapier integrations.

Key differences

  • •Worklenz is self‑hosted and open‑source; nTask is cloud‑only and proprietary
  • •Worklenz includes native budgeting, cost tracking and resource scheduling; nTask adds risk, issue and meeting management
  • •nTask connects to 1,000+ apps via Zapier; Worklenz has no listed third‑party integrations
  • •Free tier limits: Worklenz caps three active projects, nTask caps five team members
  • •Deployment and maintenance: Worklenz requires Docker/Postgres setup, nTask requires no infrastructure
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both have freemium plans; Worklenz free cloud limits projects, nTask free limits users—value depends on need

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

nTask is cloud SaaS with no self‑hosting, generally easier for non‑technical teams

nTask

Features & depth

Worklenz includes budgeting, cost tracking, resource planning; nTask lacks these but adds risk/issue tracking

worklenz

Integrations & ecosystem

nTask offers 1,000+ Zapier integrations; Worklenz lists no integrations

nTask

Collaboration

Both provide comments, file sharing, real‑time updates; nTask adds built‑in chat

Tie

Scalability

Worklenz can be self‑hosted and scaled via own infrastructure; nTask limited to provider’s SaaS limits

worklenz

Support & security

Worklenz offers email and live chat plus open‑source community; nTask provides no listed support channels

worklenz

Choose nTask if…

Small to mid‑size teams wanting cloud simplicity, risk/issue tracking, and extensive Zapier integrations.

Choose worklenz if…

Teams needing on‑premise control, budgeting, and resource planning, and able to manage Docker/Postgres infrastructure.

Common questions

Can I self‑host the tool?

Yes, Worklenz offers a self‑hosted Community edition; nTask is cloud‑only.

Does either product include budgeting or cost tracking?

Worklenz provides financial insights, budget and cost tracking; nTask does not list budgeting features.

What integrations are available out of the box?

nTask connects to 1,000+ apps via Zapier; Worklenz has no specified integrations.