Allo vs Microsoft Teams
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Allo is a cloud business phone system built around an AI receptionist that answers, routes, and summarizes every call in real time. It records and transcribes conversations, drafts post-call emails and texts, and pushes structured notes straight into the CRM so reps do not have to log calls manually. Built for sales, support, and service teams, Allo bundles unlimited calling and texting, an AI-powered IVR, and a power dialer for outbound campaigns into one flat per-user price. It integrates with tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, and Zapier, making it a fit for teams that want a phone system that already speaks CRM.
Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration platform bundled with Microsoft 365, combining chat, video meetings, and file sharing built directly on top of SharePoint and OneDrive. It is the default hub for meetings and internal messaging at organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365. Teams organizes work into teams and channels similar to other chat platforms, but is distinguished by tight integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Planner, allowing documents to be co-authored directly inside a channel without leaving the app. Meetings support up to thousands of attendees with features like live captions, together mode, and background noise suppression, making Teams a common choice for both daily standups and large all-hands meetings.
Free tier available; included with Microsoft 365 Business plans from $6/user/month.
- Flat per-user pricing with no add-on fees for AI features
- AI receptionist can qualify and route calls without a human answering
- Deep CRM integrations reduce manual call logging
- Built-in power dialer speeds up outbound sales calls
- Deep Office 365 integration
- Scales to very large meetings
- Strong enterprise admin controls
- Included with many M365 plans
- No free tier, only a 7-day trial
- Newer entrant with a smaller track record than established VoIP providers
- Advanced automation may be more than solo users or very small teams need
- Interface can feel cluttered
- Can be resource-heavy on older machines
- Channel organization less intuitive than competitors
What reviewers say
Allo Reviews
No reviews yet.
Microsoft Teams Reviews
4.5 (4)Highly recommend Microsoft Teams
We've been using Microsoft Teams for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference for our team. Strong enterprise admin controls. One minor gripe: can be resource-heavy on older machines, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Great tool for communication
Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Scales to very large meetings. One minor gripe: interface can feel cluttered, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Highly recommend Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Strong enterprise admin controls. No major complaints so far. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Allo
View all →
Shared business phone system with calling, texting, and an AI agent, formerly known as OpenPhone.
Reach hundreds of contacts at once with AI voice calls, automatic summaries, and Kanban follow-ups.
