FindAlternative
Back to Float

Float vs Jira

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Float
FloatResource scheduling and capacity planning software that shows who's working on what and what's next.
Jira
JiraThe #1 software development tool used by agile teams
Overview
Description

Float is a resource management platform that gives teams a live view of staff availability, project assignments, and delivery status, so managers can plan capacity and reassign work without guesswork. It combines scheduling with time tracking, letting teams compare planned estimates against actual hours worked on each project. Beyond scheduling, Float provides project cost estimation, margin and budget dashboards, and AI-assisted staffing suggestions to help fill open project slots with the right people. It's used by agencies, consultancies, and studios that need to see delivery performance across many concurrent projects at once, and is trusted by 4,500+ firms with B Corp certification.

Jira is a proprietary issue tracking product developed by Atlassian that allows bug tracking and agile project management.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Freemium

Free for up to 10 users; paid plans from about $7.75/user/month.

Category
Project Management
Project Management
Best for
Agencies, consultancies, and studios managing team capacity across multiple projects
Software and enterprise teams
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email, Priority support with SLAs (Enterprise)
key integrations
Zapier, CRM systems, financial tools, HR systems
platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Purpose-built for capacity planning rather than a general project management add-on
  • Estimates-vs-actuals reporting gives clear visibility into project profitability
  • 30-day free trial with no credit card required
  • B Corp certified and well-established with 4,500+ customer firms
  • Powerful and configurable
  • Strong agile support
  • Scales to enterprise
  • Big ecosystem
Cons
  • Per-person pricing can get expensive for larger teams needing the Pro tier
  • Enterprise pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation
  • Focused on scheduling and capacity rather than task-level project management like Asana or Linear
  • Can be complex/heavy
  • Configuration overhead
  • Overkill for tiny teams
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
6
User rating
Not enough data
4.5 (4)

What reviewers say

Float Reviews

No reviews yet.

Jira Reviews

4.5 (4)
Verified User

Solid choice

Tried Jira recently. Big ecosystem. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Verified User

Recommend Jira

We rolled out Jira last quarter. Strong agile support. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Verified User

Decent with caveats

We rolled out Jira last quarter. Upside: scales to enterprise. Downside: configuration overhead.

Read all reviews →

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Float

View all →
worklenz
worklenz

All‑in‑one open‑source project management for teams and agencies

Compare
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com

AI-powered project and resource management built for client-services profitability

Compare
Toggl Plan
Toggl Plan

Visual team calendar and timeline tool for planning projects and balancing workloads.

Compare

Alternatives to Jira

View all →
OpenProject
OpenProject

Free and open source project management software

Compare
Asana
Asana

Work management for teams to plan and track projects.

Compare
Linear
Linear

Fast, opinionated issue tracking built for software teams.

Compare
ClickUp
ClickUp

All-in-one work platform: tasks, docs, goals, and more.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Jira is a comprehensive agile development platform with a free tier but higher complexity, while Float is a specialized, higher‑priced capacity‑planning tool focused on agencies.

Key differences

  • Primary purpose: issue/ agile tracking (Jira) vs resource scheduling & capacity planning (Float)
  • Pricing model: freemium up to 10 users (Jira) vs paid subscription only (Float)
  • Target audience: software/enterprise teams (Jira) vs agencies, consultancies, studios (Float)
  • Feature focus: customizable workflows, roadmaps, reporting (Jira) vs AI staffing, cost estimation, real‑time availability (Float)
  • Integration breadth: large Atlassian ecosystem (Jira) vs Zapier and select financial/HR tools (Float)
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Jira offers a free tier for up to 10 users; Float has no free option and charges per person.

Jira

Ease of use / learning curve

Float is purpose‑built for capacity planning and is generally simpler; Jira can be complex and heavy.

Float

Features & depth

Jira provides extensive agile boards, customizable workflows, roadmaps and reporting; Float focuses on scheduling and budgeting.

Jira

Integrations & ecosystem

Jira benefits from a deep Atlassian ecosystem; Float lists Zapier and limited financial/HR integrations.

Jira

Scalability

Jira explicitly scales to enterprise size; Float’s enterprise pricing is unpublished but implied.

Jira

Support

Float offers email and priority support with SLAs for enterprise; Jira support details not provided.

Float

Choose Float if…

Agencies or consultancies that require real‑time capacity planning, cost estimation, and AI staffing recommendations.

Choose Jira if…

Software development teams needing full agile project management and a free entry tier.

Common questions

Does Jira have a free version?

Yes, Jira offers a freemium plan free for up to 10 users.

Can Float manage individual task boards like Jira’s Scrum board?

No, Float is focused on resource scheduling and capacity, not task‑level board management.

Which tool provides broader integration options?

Jira, with its large Atlassian ecosystem, offers more extensive integrations than Float’s Zapier‑based connections.