Microsoft Teams vs Quo
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration platform bundled with Microsoft 365, combining chat, video meetings, and file sharing built directly on top of SharePoint and OneDrive. It is the default hub for meetings and internal messaging at organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365. Teams organizes work into teams and channels similar to other chat platforms, but is distinguished by tight integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Planner, allowing documents to be co-authored directly inside a channel without leaving the app. Meetings support up to thousands of attendees with features like live captions, together mode, and background noise suppression, making Teams a common choice for both daily standups and large all-hands meetings.
Quo, rebranded from OpenPhone in September 2025, is a VoIP-based business phone system that gives teams shared numbers, calling, and SMS/MMS messaging in one collaborative inbox. Multiple teammates can see and respond to the same business number's calls and texts, with routing rules to direct incoming contacts to the right person. Quo layers an AI agent called Sona on top of the phone system to answer calls automatically, transcribe conversations, and summarize them, along with call recording and analytics. It is used mainly by startups and small businesses that need a professional, multi-line phone presence without deploying a traditional PBX, and it integrates with common CRMs like HubSpot and Salesforce on its higher tiers.
Free tier available; included with Microsoft 365 Business plans from $6/user/month.
- Deep Office 365 integration
- Scales to very large meetings
- Strong enterprise admin controls
- Included with many M365 plans
- Genuinely shared numbers make small-team phone support feel organized instead of chaotic
- Sona AI agent reduces missed calls outside business hours
- Clean, modern apps across desktop, iOS, and Android
- CRM integrations are useful for sales-heavy small teams
- Interface can feel cluttered
- Can be resource-heavy on older machines
- Channel organization less intuitive than competitors
- Recent rebrand from OpenPhone to Quo may confuse existing users and search results for a while
- Per-user pricing adds up quickly for larger teams
- Advanced AI and integration features are gated behind the pricier Business and Scale tiers
What reviewers say
Microsoft Teams Reviews
4.5 (4)Highly recommend Microsoft Teams
We've been using Microsoft Teams for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference for our team. Strong enterprise admin controls. One minor gripe: can be resource-heavy on older machines, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Great tool for communication
Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Scales to very large meetings. One minor gripe: interface can feel cluttered, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Highly recommend Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Strong enterprise admin controls. No major complaints so far. Would recommend to anyone considering it.
Quo Reviews
No reviews yet.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Microsoft Teams
View all →Alternatives to Quo
View all →Cloud business phone, messaging, and video platform with AI-powered call handling.